On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 2:53 AM Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
[...]
> At this moment it's best to make unstable in line
> with testing again.
I could start to do this, but it would take some time.
> > 2. more packages need rebuild
>
> I don't understand why you say that. Only the reverse build dependencies
> of golang-golang-x-net-dev need to be rebuild and migrate to testing,
> no? That the packages in unstable aren't all build with the sources in
> unstable is normal right, so no big deal.
A Build-Depends golang-golang-x-net-dev and B;
B is divaricated in unstable and testing.
To make A migrate to testing after rebuilding in unstable, B needs
updating(revert), otherwise it is blocked by B.
Then B is updated and migrates to testing, now every package
Build-Depends B needs rebuilding, for out-dated Build-Using reason.
So eventually the rebuild set is {golang-golang-x-net-dev's reverse
Build-Depends, B's reverse Build-Depends}.
And this set is stable only when all Go related packages in unstable
and testing are aligned.
--
Shengjing Zhu
