Dear Maintainer, I need to apologize, I am really sorry about this. I was trying to help some one that is having problems submitting bugreports. Using Debian Buster on a VM, and all though I had some problems with nano, the editor I choose, I don't think it was a bug, it was me, PBCAK, and I did not expect the report to get submitted. You can mark it as solved, or even remove it if that is possible again, I sincerely apologize for this.
Thank you ----- Original Message ----- From: "bryan" <ga...@garryricketsonartworks.com> 928...@bugs.debian.org To:"Debian Bug Tracking System" <sub...@bugs.debian.org> Cc: Sent:Fri, 03 May 2019 16:43:55 -0500 Subject:Bug#928409: nano: does not exit with ^x option Package: nano Version: 3.2-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Actually now, using a differnt WM it seems to be working fine. I am using OpneBox now, and was using I3 before. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Changed window manager * What was the outcome of this action? Seems like nano is working as expected now. * What outcome did you expect instead? Well, I expected the same, but apparently it is not nano, but the window manager -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages nano depends on: ii libc6 2.28-8 ii libncursesw6 6.1+20181013-2 ii libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1 nano recommends no packages. Versions of packages nano suggests: pn spell <none> -- no debconf information
