On 5/1/19 7:42 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > [2019-04-28 21:05] Jesse Smith <jsm...@resonatingmedia.com> >> I have been looking into the issues with the insserv test scripts. There >> are a few problems here, in brief: >> [...] >> >> In other words, I think there is some difference in expectations between >> what I think insserv should be doing and what the scripts we inherited >> from downstream think insserv should be doing. I'm interested in getting >> some feedback on this. If a script has no LSB header, should it be given >> preset defaults, or should it be ignored? If the latter, I think we can >> remove this series of tests. Which will mean there are just two errors >> left for me to sort out. > In my opinion, insserv should print warning about missing LSB headers > and ignore them.
I agree, which is good, that is what insserv currently does during the test. I'll mark this test as "passed".
