hi Jonas tahns in any case for your help! El mié., 20 de mar. de 2019 a la(s) 14:35, Jonas Smedegaard (jo...@jones.dk) escribió: > Seriously? You blame it on CDBS, immediately after it is pointed out to i try to provide a issue to other that no have voice.. even though Ithe bugtracking system only need a mail.. but CDBS fails in other customized environments.. that not happened with normal dh ruoles, that's all
> It means that licensecheck is missing - and that the build routines > Concretely you can simply remove the build-dependency - or try backport > 2.0.0+20170516-1 or newer which has done exactly that. yeah.. it's not need due its only backporint not checking newer version.. > When your build routines did not fail due to missing licensecheck, then > it means something is broken at your end. as i saidn the only error its at d-shlibs > CDBS may be an object for your hatred, but it is not broken. do you see or take a view ot the rule file at that package jajaj X-D > Talking shit about quality of Debian packages, and claiming they lie, > makes me loose interest in helping you. newer releases of the debian cut support of older hardware.. that's my problem.. that older hardware are in perfect conditions... > Closing this as not a bug in Debian. yes, i'll try to backport with a custom rules for that purposes.. thanks for help anyway!
