> I'll check that soon and get back to you with the results > > Ramzi
Hi Ramzi, did you ever verified under what conditions the second hunk of the patch is necessary? I mean this bit in nss.c: @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ return -EINVAL; /* get princ's realm */ - princ_realm = strstr(princ, "@"); + princ_realm = strrchr(princ, '@'); if (princ_realm == NULL) return -EINVAL; princ_realm++;
