Hi Jim--

On Fri 2019-03-01 18:01:52 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Daniel, The problem (and I know this isn't Debian specific, but it does
> affect Debian users of dirmngr) is that the servers in hkps.pool.sks-
> keyservers.net exist in Europe, whereas ha.pool and na.pool have greater
> access. Ideally, in 2019, the totality of the pool servers should all
> have TLS support.  Debian should be spearheading this effort.

Debian isn't responsible for the sks pool, and a quick glance at
https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ suggests that not nearly enough SKS
servers in the pool support TLS to support the outcome you're aiming
for.

I sympathize with your goals -- i also want more hkps support available,
and would be happy to talk more about how we get there (or perhaps how
we replace the SKS keyserver pool with something different
entirely). But the debian BTS is not the right place to move that
forward.  A better place for this conversation would be:

    SKS development list <sks-de...@nongnu.org>
    https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

Regards,

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to