Thank you for quick reply. ;-) On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:41:32 +0100 Hilmar Preuße <hill...@web.de> wrote:
> > It is hard question for me. I had resolved this problem. > > I reported this issue for feature user. > > > Yes, and we're thankful for this report! Yes, I am respecting to maintain such a big texlive* package. > > > It seems for me that texlive-extra-utils should be separate > > packages. Is this too difficult? If it is true, I agree with you. > > > Sorry, I don't understand your suggestion? Sorry, I have a few explanation of my idea. if I have memory for apt and aptitude, please let me know. 1) apt install with depend package and recommend package(s). 2) aptitude install only depend package(s). if you want to install with aptitude install with recommend package(s). It needs --with-recommends or -r > > My proposal is to make texlive-latex-extra recommend > liblog-log4perl-perl instead of depend. The advantage would be, that apt > installs liblog-log4perl-perl by default, but people would have a chance > to remove that package if they don't need it as they are not aware of > latexindent It seems for me that your proposal is good for apt users. But I and some people would like to use aptitude. Yes, I knew that Debian project recommends to use apt in official document. Some of people use other tool. -- ====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp クレクレタコラは好き / クレクレタコだはイヤ ====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+
