Markus Koschany wrote: > I'm not sure what upstream could do to improve the scaling given there > is already the -m option. Do you have any suggestions?
It seems to be optimistically assuming that there might really be a lot more bandwidth than it has seen, if it avoided resizing the scale to more than say 120% of the max bandwidth it had seen it seems to me that would solve the problem. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
