On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 14:36:11 +0100 (CET) Stefan Fritsch <s...@sfritsch.de> wrote:
> If we did a backport, rhe risk of introducing regressions would be quite high. So how about backporting it to stretch-backports? Isn't that what the backports section is for? It would be then available to those who have interest in it and are willing to accept potential side effects. If we are _not_ going to fix it in stable, I think this could still provide some convenience to some users.
