Package: ctop Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: normal There are two "ctop" packages out there, this one, packaged in Debian:
https://github.com/yadutaf/ctop/ ... and "ctop.sh", not yet packaged in Debian but occupying a similar namespace: https://ctop.sh/ https://github.com/bcicen/ctop >From what I understand, the latter is better maintained and less confusig. The last commit on yadutaf's program date from 2017 and there hasn't been an update of the Debian package since stretch, so I wonder if we really want to ship it with buster or maybe replace it with ctop.sh. Thanks! A. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages ctop depends on: ii python3 3.7.2-1 ctop recommends no packages. ctop suggests no packages.
