And just to followup the query about the libdune numeric library, they also appear to have no plans to use /usr/bin/dune. I wasn’t copied on their mailing list thread with the reply, but you can see it here:
https://lists.dune-project.org/pipermail/dune-devel/2019-January/002422.html Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > I don't think DUNE (the numerics framework) will ship /usr/bin/dune. > I thought about introducing a "dune" meta-package that would depend > on all DUNE modules available in Debian, but that could just be called > "libdune" instead; that way it would sort close to the other libdune-* > packages. This seems like a reasonable solution all around. The OCaml Dune Debian package could also be called libocaml-dune or something, if you feel that `dune` is too generic a name. The /usr/bin/dune binary name is very very hard for us to rename, however, since it is so embedded in so many project Makefiles. regards, Anil
