On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:20:49PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I'd possibly do both? grub-installer is one obvious place to make d-i > add things (and the patch there also looks fairly obvious, roughly > what I also considered myself), but that *only* works for d-i. If we > add the Recommends: for shim-signed, people will get a reasonable > package set by default if they just install grub-efi-amd64-signed. > > Basically, I think encoding that in the normal package relationship > with the Recommends: is the right thing to do anyway.
Fair enough; committing your patch. Can I leave the grub-installer bit to you? We presumably need to decide whether to have it install grub-efi-amd64-signed rather than grub-efi-amd64 by default, at the very least. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
