reopen 306892 thanks Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:57:54PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> Have all of Thomas's concerns been addressed by this upload? > > Just the segfault, which was the main topic of the bug. I'm sorry I > didn't ask thomas to file bugs as necessary for the different issues; > that'll be easier to track. > > 1) I claimed to be fixed. > 2) isn't, AFAIK, but now its a lot less noticable, of course. Please reopen the bug and leave this as work to be done. > 3) is pretty closely related to 2), isn't it? Yes, this is a clone of 2. > 4) is a nice wishlist No, it's not, because this is already a documented feature of the program. It advertises a --lock-expire-timeout and related flags which do not work. > 5) is totally correct So is this fixed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
