On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:49:13PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:12:06PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:42:01AM +0000, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> >>Hi Steve
> >>
> >>On 05/01/2019 15:40, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >>> Package: src:p4est
> >>> Version: 1.1-5
> >>> Severity: important
> >>>
> >>> I've been doing a full rebuild of the Debian archive, building all
> >>> source packages targeting armel and armhf using arm64 hardware. We are
> >>> planning in future to move all of our 32-bit armel/armhf builds to
> >>> using arm64 machines, so this rebuild is to identify packages that
> >>> might have problems with this configuration.
> >>>
> >>You submitted this and a number of other MPI-test based bugs. I believe they
> >>may be due to #918157, a regression in pmix that breaks MPI on 32-bit
> >>archs.
> >>
> >>I've uploaded a new openmpi (3.1.3-8) that uses its internal pmix until a
> >>fix
> >>is found for #918157, so these should now work. Can you re-test ?
> >
> >Sure, no problem. I've just queued all those builds to rebuild again
> >now. I'll let you know how that goes.
>
> Not looking good, I'm afraid. The errors are different, but still
> seeing errors. From the dune-common rebuild:
>
> ...
> 1/91 Test #1: indexsettest ........................... Passed 0.01 sec
> Start 2: remoteindicestest
> 2/91 Test #2: remoteindicestest ......................***Failed 0.05 sec
> [mjolnir:16218] mca_base_component_repository_open: unable to open
> mca_pmix_pmix2x:
> /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/openmpi/lib/openmpi3/mca_pmix_pmix2x.
> so: undefined symbol: OPAL_MCA_PMIX2X_PMIx_Get_version (ignored)
>...
That's #918713, which is caused by the workaround for #918157 in 3.1.3-8.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
