Dear Dirk and Jörg-Volker, On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 08:54:22 +0100 Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpe...@web.de> wrote:
> the problem I see, shows when inspecting /usr/lib/R/modules/lapack.so with > > $ ldd /usr/lib/R/modules/lapack.so | grep blas > libblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libblas.so.3 >(0x00007f58c61b5000) > libopenblas.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenblas.so.0 >(0x00007f58c2dbb000) > > Thus, lapack.so of package r-base-core is linked to libopenblas.so.0 > which means that r-base-core won't work without package libopenblas-base. > And that is not intended AFAIU. As explained in <1546860281.3311.22.ca...@debian.org>, I think there is no bug. ldd lists libopenblas.so.0 as a dependency, but it is not actually needed. I guess it's only listed because it's a *indirect* dependency through libblas.so.3, when openblas is selected as the BLAS alternative. As a matter of fact, R runs fine without libopenblas-base installed. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
