On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:34:04AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 07:43:03AM -0500, James McCoy wrote: >>On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:53:29PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> >>> amdahl is the arm64 porterbox, and I've just checked - it has armel >>> and armhf schroots configured too. That should hopefully cover what >>> you need - shout if you need anything more! >> >>Unfortunately, I wasn't able to reproduce either of the issues on >>amdahl. I built in both armel and armhf chroots. >> >>Still looking into the screen dump issue. In the mean time, I'll be >>pulling in a new upstream patch level soon, so I guess we can see if >>that helps at all. > >OK, this is really weird. I've just built by hand locally using >debuild, and things work. But the exact same version is failing using >sbuild *on the same machine*. I'm pondering if there *might* be some >build dependency difference or something! I'm going to try again in a >totally clean chroot now.
And that builds just fine. I'm confused now, there must be something causing this build failure but I can't see exactly what. :-( Apologies for taking your time here, and thanks for being so responsive already! I'll keep looking into this and see if I can find any more clues. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane...
