severity 357160 grave merge 357160 356984 357024 357067 thanks Hi,
Charles L Wilcox wrote: > Setting up openoffice.org-gcj (2.0.2-1) ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7: > /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj: No such file or directory [ snip ] God damnit. This bug already was reported *3* times before you filed it. (#356984, #357024, #357067). You don't need to file it again. Please check whether a bug is reported already before filing it. Thanks. > My system did not have this binary installed. Not knowing the intricacies > of Debian-ified Java and Openoffice.org, I couldn't have guessed what the > exact problem was. Looking at the contents of the directory it was > looking in, I was able to find (dpkg -L) the package 'java-gcj-compat'. > Searching for related packages, I found another package called > 'java-gcj-compat-dev'. On a guess, I "aptitude install > java-gcj-compat-dev", the above missing binary was symlinked to, and > 'openoffice.org-gcj' configured itself sucessfully. The install of > 'java-gcj-compat-dev' triggered a set of other packages to install: > > antlr ecj-bootstrap ecj-bootstrap-gcj gjdoc > > Any of these could have created the symlink. None did. java-gcj-compat-dev contains it. > > I think the dependency for "openoffice.org-gcj" needs to be updated to > ensure whatever package created this symlink. Alternatively, perhaps a > package that you do depend on *did not* create the symlink as it was > supposed to. Either way, it was a problem for me. 2.0.2-2 will use the gij symlink, which *is* i java.gcj-compat-dev. And iff you would actually have read the bug reports already filed you would have found that out because I exactly wrote that (java-gcj-compat-dev / gij) in #356984... Regards, Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
