Hello,
Am Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:19:24 +0200 schrieb Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org>: > control: retitle -1 most of munin-nodes suggests should move to > munin-plugins-core > > [..] > > The only suggests which should stay are munin and munin-plugins-java, IMO, > [..] I prepared a proposal that moves most suggests to munin-plugins-core or munin-plugins-extra: https://salsa.debian.org/sumpfralle-guest/munin/commit/b31088a2d319bc723ae9e61d7f33f99edda486a2 There are four remaining open entries: * gawk (depends) * libcrypt-ssleay-perl (suggests) * libwww-perl (suggests) * procps (depends) gawk and procps are used by many plugins. I am not sure, whether it is worth the trouble to track the plugins (and their corresponding) packages using these common tools. Regarding libcrypt-ssleay-perl and libwww-perl: I do not see a reason for these suggestions. At least there is no direct "use" or "require" to be found in upstream's sources. Both suggestions are part of the packaging since it moved to git (around 2012). Should we keep them anyway? > [.. ] and the recommends of libnet-snmp-perl should also be moved to > munin-plugins-core. See: https://salsa.debian.org/sumpfralle-guest/munin/commit/4cda8b1240871ed572e59bd7493e5393bda46c80 Both commits are part of the branch "debian-755257" in my repository on salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/sumpfralle-guest/munin). Cheers, Lars
