But upon request, packages can be adapted to target specific suites; that's
precisely what *-backports suites are.  That's why I uploaded a _modified_
hplip 3.18.10+dfsg0-3 to the `stretch-backports` suite.  That upload was
accepted today and is in the process of being built for all architectures.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hplip&suite=stretch-backports

Stretch users will be able to get the latest hplip by using the `stretch-
backports` suite additionally to their standard APT setup.

I just downloaded it. It won't build under stretch. All the builds shown in
the logs are under sid or experimental.

Correct me if I am wrong, but if you build under sid, it won't run under
stretch, because the libraries
linked against won't be the same.

I don't think it will help stretch users.

Thank you for reading this email.

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:23 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org> wrote:

> Le jeudi, 6 décembre 2018, 19.03:57 h CET Paul Elliott a écrit :
> > You guys must be developing under sid, and never checking that your
> > releases will actually build under the various stable releases.
>
> Exactly.  And it allows removing _a lot_ of unneeded complexity.  As hplip
> packager, I provide new upstream releases tailored towards the _next_
> stable
> release.  The "staging" area for this is `unstable`.  It will then migrate
> to
> `testing` (aka `buster`).
>
> Backporting these new upstream releases is a _different_ and _additional_
> work.  There's absolutely zero requirement for packages uploaded to
> `unstable`
> to build without modifications on other releases.
>
> > But your branches are still named for the various stable versions,
> > that is, debian/stretch-backports, debian/stretch,
> debian/jessie-backports,
> > debian/jessie.
>
> Yes. These build on the corresponding target suites.  They don't
> necessarily
> integrate the latest upstream releases (nor should they).
>
> > But you never check that these commits will actually build for these
> > versions.
>
> No, we don't.  Doing so would be _a lot_ of unneeded work.
>
> But upon request, packages can be adapted to target specific suites;
> that's
> precisely what *-backports suites are.  That's why I uploaded a _modified_
> hplip 3.18.10+dfsg0-3 to the `stretch-backports` suite.  That upload was
> accepted today and is in the process of being built for all architectures.
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hplip&suite=stretch-backports
>
> Stretch users will be able to get the latest hplip by using the `stretch-
> backports` suite additionally to their standard APT setup.
>
> Cheers,
>     OdyX

Reply via email to