Control: reopen -1 Control: notfixed -1 gnudatalanguage/0.9.9-1 Control: severity -1 serious Control: block 913837 by -1
Hi Ole, On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 10:59:03 +0100 Gilles Filippini wrote: > Ole Streicher a écrit le 01/12/2018 à 21:08 : > > I think that failing CI tests are not a reason for severity "serious", > > Sure. As stated in the bug report, the reason for severity "serious" was > that release team said it was a blocker for the HDF5 and netcdf > transitions [1]. I should have mentioned this link. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913837#34 > > > and your test build should have succeeded independently of the tests. > > GDL has quite a lot of tests failling, and I disable the known one in > > the CI tests (only). So, CI test failure here shows that there were > > unexpected failures. > > > > Concidently, however, there was a new version of GDL published today, > > which addresses a number of failures. Again, the failures known upstream > > are xfailed in the CI tests. I'll upload the new version and close this > > bug with the upload. Unfortunately the autopkgtests for 0.9.9-1 still fail [0], and since it's blocking the migration of hdf5 it makes the package unsuitable for release justifying the RC severity [1]. The issue is not xfails in test-GDL.py, it's test-gdl [2]: " ================================================= 4 Error(s) found ================================================= test_call_external test_delvarrnew test_hdf5 test_indgen " [0] https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gnudatalanguage/unstable/amd64/ [1] https://release.debian.org/buster/rc_policy.txt [2] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/g/gnudatalanguage/1418204/log.gz Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
