Andreas Henriksson: > Hello Niels, > > Thanks for your quick followup. > > [...] > > I've looked over the 32 (+ 1) cases and my unconfirmed view on them is > that if debhelper passed the following variables to configure: > > [... useful analysis and numbers ...] > > [...] > > I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from this exactly. I'm also not > sure what the reproducible build system staying on 32(+1) found for > a while now means. Has it tested all packages in archive yet or not? > If this is it, then I guess it's absolutely not worth bothering to do > anything in debhelper to handle this.... > > > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson >
Thanks for the analysis. :) The reproducible build issues are manually tagged. Ansgar recently submitted a MR on salsa to tag more of them in [1] and we now have ~58 issues. I looked at the chat in #d-d and allegedly this might not be complete as some packages lack a diff (plus FTBFS bugs cannot be classified as usrmerge issue directly). Thanks, ~Niels [1] https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-notes/merge_requests/23
