On 2018-11-30 14:31, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 17/11/2018 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 15/11/2018 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team,
I hereby request a transition slot for hdf5 1.10.4 currently in
experimental.
Ben file:
title = "hdf5";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libhdf5/ | .build-depends ~ /hdf5/;
is_good = .depends ~
/libhdf5-103|libhdf5-openmpi-103|libhdf5-mpich-103/;
is_bad = .depends ~
/libhdf5-100|libhdf5-openmpi-100|libhdf5-mpich-100/;
I've checked the build of all the reverse dependencies against this
release, and from the 110+ of them, only those - which are not in
testing - aren't binnmu ready:
Go ahead.
gnudatelanguage's autopkgtests fail with the new hdf5/netcdf, which
block
netcdf's testing migration. Can you take a look?
https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gnudatalanguage/testing/amd64/
I'll have a look this w-e, but I'm not very optimistic because these
failures are segmentation faults.
Since gnudatalanguage has a not so high popcon, an option would be to
temporarily remove it from testing, to gain time to investigate the
problem.
BTW the conflicts between the new libhdf package and the old one is
causing lots
of trouble for the transition, because the two packages are not
co-installable
and means all or most of the rdeps need to migrate at the same time. I
noticed
that upstream bumped the SOVERSION for only one shared lib but not the
others,
and since you ship them all in the same package, that's forcing the
need for the
Conflicts. Once this transition is over, can you either split the
shared libs in
separate packages if upstream is not going to keep them in sync, or ask
upstream
to keep the SOVERSIONs in sync? The latter would be easier.
Oh, I'm sorry about that. Upstream has been quite unpredictable with the
SOVERSIONs. I'll discuss that with them.
Thanks,
_g.
