--- Begin Message ---
In case you want to file my little reply somehow ...
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:18:07 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry)
Subject: Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed! ([tex-live]
Bug#356853: tetex-extra: No license information for bbm fonts)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
------------=_1142356687-24640-0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all. Your message has been filed under junk but
otherwise ignored.
This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and tell us which package the report is on. For help, check out
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.
Your message was dated Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:55:56 -0600 and had
message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject [tex-live] Bug#356853: tetex-extra: No license information for bbm
fonts.
The complete text of it is attached to this message.
If you need any assistance or explanation please contact me.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
------------=_1142356687-24640-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2006 16:55:58 +0000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server1.f7.net ([64.34.169.74] helo=f7.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1FJCoP-0004xn-OG; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:55:57 -0800
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id k2EGtup10610;
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:55:56 -0600
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:55:56 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [tex-live] Bug#356853: tetex-extra: No license information for bbm
fonts
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
MIME-Version: 1.0
have any licensing information. They are catalogue'ed as "unknown" and
have no license statement in the files.
Sigh. I'm sure Gilles simply copied an older version of the CM files
which did not have license statements, and intended the same license as
CM (inasmuch as he thought about it at all).
Does anybody know the author,
I don't know him, but I wrote Michel Goossens about it.
------------=_1142356687-24640-0--
--- End Message ---
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
