On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:35:15 +0100 David Paleino <da...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sunday 27 December 2009 23:27:33, Craig Sanders wrote: > > how should we handle this? should I release a new dlocate without > > completion first, or will you divert the completion file to your > > package? > > It would be best if you released a dlocate without completion, and next I > release a package Conflicting with dlocate (<< new_version). > I think that's sufficient. Any other idea?
Hi, Craig, Are you still willing to move the completion file for dlocate from the dlocate package to bash-completion (upstream and downstream)? If so, I'll prepare a patch for upstream bash-completion, as well as an upload for downstream bash-completion and wait for your upload removing it from dlocate. > For the upstream team: the conflict is obviously only related to the Debian > package, to avoid file conflicts on installation. This conflict is not really necessary anymore, because completion files are now installed under /usr/share/bash-completion/completions, and dlocate still uses the obsolete dir, i.e.: /etc/bash_completion.d/, thus, there would be no installation conflicts. Thanks, Gabriel
