Hello Michael, Michael Biebl [2018-11-17 15:47 +0100]: > > I know that arm64 EFI boot works (Canonical uses it in their internal > > OpenStack deployment), but as far as I know there is no existing > > armhf EFI implementation; so this would mean to ship dead bits. Or are > > you aware of any platform where this could actually be tested? > > Martin, do you still have concerns regarding enabling gnu-efi support > for armhf? > Personally I don't have any experience in that regard, all I can say is > that we apparently ship > https://packages.debian.org/sid/armhf/grub-efi-arm > (with a popcon count of 0 :-o )
Not a strong veto, if that somehow makes the packaging simpler and more consistent across architctures. I still don't quite like shipping dead bits that can't actually run anywhere, but they are relatively harmless, too. Martin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
