On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:25:00 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > If the maintainer field is set to <deity@l.d.o>, then I would > obviously need to subscribe to that list, and the e-mail traffic > related to apt-listbugs would be intermingled with the rest of > the messages directed there. I am not sure I can afford such an > increase in my incoming e-mail traffic... Not in the short term, at > least...
On a second thought, I could set the maintainer field to <deity@l.d.o>, without subscribing to the mailing list, and then subscribe my e-mail address to the apt-listbugs package tracker notifications... That way, I would receive the e-mail traffic related to apt-listbugs, as I currently do, but not the rest of <deity@l.d.o> traffic. At the same time, all the e-mail traffic related to apt-listbugs would be directed to <deity@l.d.o>, so that bug reports would get more visibility and others could have an opportunity to comment on them, etc. Would that be OK with you? Or is that too asymmetrical, perhaps? -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpfJ7Dk7qjVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
