Hi Hubert, Hubert Chathi wrote: > Ugh. Sorry for causing delays to the transition.
JFTR: I'm not involved in the transition, just a user who noticed that he can't upgrade boost in unstable because of nheko and then seeing that it waits for build-dependencies on nearly all architectures for 50 days or so due to the missing "-dev" in the package name. That's also why I didn't file this as RC as I wasn't sure if it really is. I must admit that I just noticed now that it was not blocking the transition of boost to testing as the version in testing doesn't seem to depend ob boost. Just the amd64 version of 0.6.1-1 (the only architecture that got built) blocked installing a newer boost on unstable. Nevertheless it's good to have those copy-and-paste issues fixed as they would have surely become an issue with the next boost after 1.67 since the versioned package names were the only ones which were resolvable if at all. > I'm rebuilding and will upload shortly. Thanks for the prompt reaction! This looks much better now: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nheko No more "BD-Uninstallable" for any release architecture. And the remaining "BD-Uninstallable" for many non-release architectures are different per architecture and hence seem to be architecture issues and not issues with the nheko package. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
