On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:16:29PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Another thing I've thought of doing is wrapping the dlopen library > > call to trace all calls to hopefully locate the source of the issue. > > > > But I still don't understand why you would not divert libGL.so when > > libGL.so.1 is being diverted - it doesn't make any sense to me. > > We are diverting it (otherwise it would be a dangling symlink) - we just > set the alternative unconditionally to the diverted one because we don't > want anything to get linked against the proprietary libraries at compile > time.
Dear Andreas and Luca, Thanks for that explanation - it makes sense now. And I've managed to locate the bug in Qt at long last!! Just testing my proposed patch and then I'll submit a bug report against the correct package.... Best wishes, Julian
