On 05/11/2018 16:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 27/10/2018 15:01, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: >> Thanks for the explanations. >> >>> We can't move (or binNMU) a package from experimental to unstable. So you'll >>> need to do uploads in those cases. >> >> All packages from experimental have been reuploaded to unstable. >> >>> For the two packages that are ready in unstable (music123 and >>> ada-reference-manual) I could schedule binNMUs. Just let me know when we are >>> ready to do that. >> >> It should be possible to rebuild 'music123' soon. >> dw music123_16.4-3 . ANY . -m 'gnat (>= 8)' >> >> Phil has reuploaded 'topal' to unstable, so it now belongs to this category. >> dw topal_78-2 . ANY . -m 'gnat (>= 8)' > > Both binNMUed (command is nmu, not dw). > >>>> Should I fill separate bugs for the removal of polyorb and spark? >>> For testing removal, I can do that as part of this transition bug, no need >>> for >>> separate ones. >> >> Please remove these packages from testing. >> polyorb/2.11~20140418-5 >> spark/2012.0.deb-11 > > Removal hints added. > > What should happen with plplot and ghdl? Do they need to be binNMUed?
FWIW with some hints, gnat migrated to testing: final: adacgi,adasockets,ahven,anet,dbusada,dh-ada-library,gnat,gprbuild,libalog,libaunit,libflorist,libgmpada,libgtkada,libncursesada,libtemplates-parser,libtexttools,libxmlada,libxmlezout,opentoken,pcscada Cheers, Emilio
