El lun, 13-03-2006 a las 16:26 +0100, Francesco Potorti` escribió: > Generally speaking, a trace that does not log date and time is an error: > you don't know when things happened. If the log is in the same format > as it is now, but with time logged, that would be a great improvement. > True, but that is a different bug. The fact that logging without a timestamp is wrong doesn't mean that logging the sleeping and awaking lines is rigth.
> Moreover, having in addition a log of transactions that did not get any > mail would be helpful, even if not as important as the above mentioned > feature. > Well, it is a fact that logging hundreds of 'all is well/nothing is happening' lines hides the usufull info in huge logs. > I would say that the missing date and time is a "normal" bug, unless > there are other ways of obtaining them by using configuration or command > line options. > Yes, it is. Like I say, it is another bug. I'll rename this bug to state that one. > I would also say that having logs of transactions that do not get any > mail is a "wishlist" bug. Fell free to open whishlist bug for that, but most likely I'll tag it as wontfix. Regards, Héctor
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
