Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-12 20:42]: > > > > c++ -I../../include -DOX_DEFAULT_POOL=\"/usr/share/xclass/icons\" > > > > -DOX_DEFAULT_ROOT=\"\" -O2 -fPIC -c OXListTree.cc > > > > ../../include/xclass/OXListTree.h:143: error: extra qualification > > > > 'OXListTree::' on member '_FindItem' > > > What is the problem with the below statement? Are you no longer allowed > > to call classname::function inside the classname itself? > > No. Sorry, I cannot give you a reason, but I'm sure it's G++ just > becoming more standards compliant.
It has never been valid to use qualified names in member declarations in class definitions; g++ just had a lax parser in the past. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782> for the reasons behind the change. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
