Hi! On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 08:46:33 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Fair enough. Personally, I’m happy with either name. Certainly, “golang” is > used in enough places that people know what is meant. As long as we refer > to the language (e.g. in the section description) by “Go”, I think we > should be good.
Yes, the original proposed description by Josh Triplett, makes it pretty clear IMO: ,--- Go programming language, libraries, and development tools Packages in the "golang" section provide implementations of the Go programming language, development tools for Go, and many third-party Go libraries. `--- So, could we get the golang section created? We've got more than 1100 binary packages now in the archive that seem to fit the section. And the most important blockers have now included the patches to add the section information. It would definitely be nice to have it ready for buster. Thanks, Guillem
