Hi Emmanuel, Thanks for reviewing my packaging!
On 2018-10-19 13:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > If possible I think the non Java > stuff should be moved to another source packages maintained by the > proper language team, such that the Java Team can freely upgrade antlr > without affecting packages outside its scope. I have always thought that a single upstream's source (i.e. tarball) should not appear in more than one source package. But now I see the point in splitting the upstream's source in order to split the responsibilities. > Here for example the version embedded in the name of new > libantlr4-runtime4.7.1 package suggests that any update of antlr will > have to go through the NEW queue, which is rather inconvenient. True indeed. OK, I will work on separating Java and C packages for antlr4 when I have time. Thanks, Andrius -- Andrius Merkys Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325 LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
