Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2018-07-12 11:25:58 -0400, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: > > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. > > > > This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it > > current is useful for all the packages that depend on it. > > > > The debdiff from the previous version in stretch is not attached > > because it was being rejected as spam. > > > > This proposed release is also available at the > > "publicsuffix_debian/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1" tag on the > > "debian/stretch" branch at > > the git repo for publicsuffix packaging: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/publicsuffix > > > > Please followup on this ticket to confirm whether I should upload > > this > > revision to stretch. > > I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug > report, > and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with this > message: > > <903...@bugs.debian.org>: host buxtehude.debian.org[209.87.16.39] > said: 550 > malware detected: Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.db3039.UNOFFICIAL: message > rejected > (in reply to end of DATA command)
I'd be interested to know if that's still the case. Does changing the compression format help? Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
