On 09/22/2018 06:55 PM, zieg...@uni-freiburg.de wrote:
Version: 1:2.0.28-1+b1
This is odd since this exact problem was fixed in 2.0.20. It was fixed in response to #719659. As a result, we should be able to handle 1024 connections. Do we somehow have a regression? Or was this not properly tested back in 2.0.20?
I'll have a closer look. Ted.
