Hi Neil, On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> > > * Package name : black > Version : 18.6b4 > Upstream Author : Łukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> > * URL : https://github.com/ambv/black > * License : BSD-3-Clause > Programming Lang: Python > Description : uncompromising Python code formatter [...] > We'd like to use black as part of code review for LAVA and > associated python packages. I'm currently investigating if this > should be maintained by the LAVA team or the Python Modules team. > > The package needs a small patch to remove privacy-breaching tracking URLs > from the docs.
Thank you for packaging black! I have subscribed to this bug because I plan to enable support for it in Elpy (Emacs Python IDE) once black is in the archive. Given that its code review functionality is used outside of LAVA I suspect the Python Modules team would be more appropriate, but I don't have a strong opinion either way. Kind regards, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
