hi again, thanks for answering Felipe.
Alessio, if cadence was in the archive, would removing the UI from ladish seem like a good solution? cheers, piem On 09/10/2018 11:33 PM, Filipe Coelho wrote: > hey all. > > ladish is pretty much dead. > that said, you could build the project with just the backend/CLI, and > leave the gtk ui behind. > this satisfies cadence (claudia) needs, since it actually implements a > full new frontend for ladish. > > if that is not an option, just remove ladish altogether and take it out > as dependency from cadence. > it is not a hard requirement for it to run, it will just lose some > features. > > > On 10.09.2018 22:20, Paul Brossier wrote: >> hi all, >> >> flowcanvas should definitely removed, and ganv adopted, since it is >> being used in newer tools such as Cadence (see >> https://github.com/falkTX/Cadence) >> >> ideally, ladish should be switched from using flowcanvas to using ganv. >> I started looking at that, but there is quite a few API changes between >> flowcanvas and ganv, so it is a bit more than a trivial search and >> replace. >> >> Maybe drobilla or falktx (CCed) would want to help here? >> >> cheers, piem >> >> >> On 01/28/2018 03:12 PM, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote: >>> Le 2018-01-28 14:38, Simon McVittie a écrit : >>>> Source: flowcanvas >>>> Severity: important >>>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org >>>> Usertags: proposed-removal >>>> Control: clone -1 -2 >>>> Control: reassign -2 ladish >>>> Control: retitle -2 ladish: should this package be removed? >>>> >>>> flowcanvas depends on numerous obsolete GNOME 2-era libraries >>>> (e.g. #885095) and hasn't had a maintainer upload since 2009. Its >>>> upstream >>>> website says: >>>> >>>> **Note**: FlowCanvas is dead, long live Ganv! >>>> >>>> ganv is also in Debian as src:ganv; it's orphaned in Debian, but >>>> appears >>>> to have commit activity upstream. >>>> >>>> flowcanvas has one reverse-dependency in Debian, gladish (src:ladish), >>>> whose most recent maintainer upload was in 2014. web.archive.org says >>>> the ladish.org website has been down since mid 2014. >>> ladish looks to be maintained by alessio (last commit 20 Apr 2017) >>> here : >>> https://github.com/alessio/ladish/ >>> (the same goes laditools as well) >>> >>> >>> >>>> These packages both seem like candidates for removal from unstable. >>> It would be a big regression from a user point of view since it'll >>> remove >>> the "studio" (reopen everything in one-click) from Debian with no >>> alternative. >>> >>> >>> >>>> If you agree, please reassign this bug to the ftp team with >>>> cont...@bugs.debian.org commands similar to these: >>>> >>>> severity xxxxxx normal >>>> reassign xxxxxx ftp.debian.org >>>> retitle xxxxxx RM: flowcanvas -- RoQA; depends on obsolete libraries, >>>> superseded by ganv >>>> >>>> severity yyyyyy normal >>>> reassign yyyyyy ftp.debian.org >>>> retitle yyyyyy RM: ladish -- RoQA; depends on obsolete libraries, >>>> appears unmaintained upstream >>>> >>>> (replacing RoQA with RoM if you are a maintainer of the appropriate >>>> package). >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> smcv >>> Hope that helps. >>> Olivier >>> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
