On 9/1/18 23:58, Arian Sanusi wrote: > I have these interfaces: > "bridge": a bridge without any ports connected on start, LXCs connect here. > It's configured in /etc/network/interfaces, and I expect NM not to touch it > "mlan0": wifi, not in interfaces, expected to be handled by NM > "lo": for completeness sake > "eth0": not alway there (USB-interface) expected to be handled by NM. > > The one thing that's not as expected is that NM does regard "bridge" even > though it should not.
I still don't undestand: Are you saying that NM tries to manage your "bridge" interface while it shouldn't? Or are you expecting NM to manager your bridge interface but it does not? I don't see anything in the logs which would indicate that NM manages your bridge interface, it simply shows, that such a device has been detected. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
