Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Please see the original report citing why "set -e" is not something to
> > be considered in an init script.
>
> I have re-read this and do not understand the rationale. In my
> experienece, `set - e` ensures that the script is not full of error
> checking code that is, in- itself, prone to errors.
>
> > > I further don't see how a preference for init system is relevant here.
> >
> > As the init script is only for SysVinit, not systemd.
>
> Sure, and redis supports sysvinit so I don't see why mentioning a
> dislike for systemd is relevant, yet alone productive...?
Gentle ping on this bug?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
