Control: tags -1 + moreinfo d-i Hi,
On Thu, 2018-08-16 at 20:06 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Dear Adam, > > > > > libxcursor (1:1.1.14-1+deb9u2) stretch; urgency=high > > > > > > > > * Fix a denial of service or potentially code execution via > > > > a one-byte heap overflow. (CVE-2015-9262) Closes: #906012) > > > > > > Would it be possible to get a "yay/nay" on this s-p-u request? > > > > Please go ahead. > > Thanks; uploaded. I managed to miss that the package produces a udeb, so this needs a KiBi-ack before acceptance; tagging and CCing accordingly. > > > I wouldn't normally press for a response but this is somewhat > > > affecting what my next moves are for oldstable and oldoldstable. > > > > Isn't oldoldstable an ex-release now? > > Not in ELTS: > > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Extended Ah, I see. > > FWIW, CCing both a p-u bug and debian-release is a little > > redundant. > > Mea culpa… I wasn't sure and my apologies for any duplicates or > implications that involved. It looks like only the copy to the list showed up, so no real harm done. It was a little confusing though. :-) Regards, Adam
