On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:35:59PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On 3/7/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:20:31PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Please see http://wiki.debian.org/LinuxKernelIdeProblem that I created > > > today and have invited the kernel team and udev developers to improve > > > on. > > An assembly of patent ... > It looks to me like that's a wiki page. > In other words, you can fix problems on it directly without needing to ask > for help or permission.
Which Sven's since done, leading the page to begin with: ] The below is a pathetic attempt by Jonas to justify his inactivity on ] this bug, it is composed of patently false claims, and more insidious ] falsehood, together with some truhtfull information. ] ] Jonas is furthemore wrong in this, because he refused to apply the ] patch, because claiming caution for some hypothetical case he never was ] able to pinpoint, but didn't actually excercice the same caution when ] applying the original hack which force-loaded the ide-generic module, ] not caring if it was actually built or not. -- SvenLuther ] ] Sven -- Please sign your ranting. I've gone back and retroactively signed ] it for you -- JoeyHess Jonas's last revision, without Sven's comments, is available at: http://wiki.debian.org/LinuxKernelIdeProblem?action=recall&rev=4 From what I can see of that, the maintainer seems on track to solve the problem. I don't see any great reason to overrule that process. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
