On 2018-08-14 03:18, Carl Suster wrote: > Does that sound reasonable? The alternative is just to leave the package > in stretch alone and accept that it will degrade in functionality over > time. Users are already able to use the plowmod script and ignore the > plowshare-modules package there if they need more recent modules.
That would work. It's your call. Probably depends on the number of bugs you get against the package in stable. It probably shouldn't have been in stretch, but as long as it does not cause trouble, you can let it rot there :-) Andreas
