Control: reassign 905751 src:linux 4.9~rc3-1~exp1
Control: retitle -1 linux: CVE-2018-5390
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: fixed -1 4.9.110-3+deb9u1

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 04:42:42PM -0600, Jamie wrote:
> Package: Kernel
> 
> Version: 4.9+
> 
> Severity: Critical
> 
>  
> 
> So I was reading isc.sans.edu and came across this 
> 
> That people are dubbing "segmentsmack" 
> 
>  
> 
> https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/What+Do+I+Need+To+Know+about+SegmentSmack/
> 23964/
> 
> Which affects  Linux Kernels 4.9+ 
> 
>  
> 
> https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/962459
> 
> "The Linux kernel versions 4.9+ and supported versions of 
> 
> FreeBSD are vulnerable to denial  of service conditions with low 
> 
> rates of specially modified packets."
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Vulnerability Note VU#962459
> 
> TCP implementations vulnerable to Denial of Service
> 
>  
> 
> The Linux kernel versions 4.9+ and supported versions of FreeBSD are
> vulnerable 
> 
> to denial of service conditions with low rates of specially modified
> packets.
> 
> Description
> 
>  
> 
> CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion') -
> CVE-2018-5390
> 
>  
> 
> Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to
> tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() 
> 
> and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a
> denial of service.
> 
>  
> 
> CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion') -
> CVE-2018-6922
> 
> A TCP data structure in supported versions of FreeBSD (11, 11.1, 11.2, 10,
> and 10.4) use an 
> 
> inefficient algorithm to reassemble the data.
> 
>  
> 
> Now it does say that Debian is susceptible to this bug as well.
> 
>  
> 
> "Debian GNU/Linux        Affected              23 Jul 2018"
> 
>  
> 
> uname -a
> 
> Linux server1 4.9.0-6-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.88-1+deb9u1 (2018-05-07)
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
>  
> 
> As you can see I am on Debian 9.5 using a kernel version of 4.9.88-1+deb9u1

It is already fixed for stable via DSA-4266-1
(https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4266).

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to