El jueves, 26 de julio de 2018 13:28:25 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escribió: > El jueves, 26 de julio de 2018 11:47:50 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > > Thanks to jcristau we noted that the package can't be built on arm-arm-01 > nor in harris.d.o, possibly due to missalignment. So we need this built on > a (pure?) armhf buildd. The build suceeded on amdahl without any issues.
I need to correct myself here: amdahl, using the armhf chroot, also produces the same behavior. And I meant qtwebchannel, not qtwebengine (those names really produce me headaches). If Julien is right and this is because of misalignment, I really would love your input here: - One option would be to solve the misalignment. This is inside what's called QML, and can be even happening in a container (not in the virtual-machines eaning but stuff like QHash, QVector, QList and so). I have stumbled upon this in the past (remember when ia64 was an official arch?). Sadly there is no solution to this: the arch should support this misalignment. - Another option would be not running tests on armhf. In my point of view is pushing the dirt below the carpet, but feasible. - The third option I can think of is blacklisting qtwebchannel on arm64's buildds with armhf chroots. I think this is possible, please correct me if I am wrong. So, I would be happy to have your input here. Thanks in advance, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
