Raju Devidas wrote on 25/07/2018: > looks like I was watching the wrong branch. > You have already done the packaging as well. > > We should decide on, if I should close my original ITP instead? > > But as a compliance practice, I should have been notified, before you > filing the ITP or doing the update to Salsa. > > If this just has been a mistake (things happen. :-) ) > I am fine with closing the orginal ITP from my side as well. > > Atleast I don't see an RFS there. Please upload the package at the > earliest as I also need to package micro.
Hello Raju, I totally missed your ITP, I am sorry. I actually already asked for sponsorship on the pkg-go mailing list [0], in the email I also explain the issue with the default branch in salsa being "upstream" instead of "master". I am fine with co-maintaining the package, if you agree. The package is team maintained and I see that you already maintain some package in pkg-go, so it seems like the best solution to me. Let me know and I will add you to Uploaders and drop an email to the mailing list. Paride [0] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20180716/022653.html
