Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (2018-07-18 20:33:03) > Thank you for clarify your pov - but that doesn't change nothing - > maybe i wasn't clear enough about: pcmanfm-qt 0.13.0 uses parts of > libfm - and the libfm-modules are used by pcmanfm-qt (gvfs and other > functionality).
My clarification did change one thing: The possibility of concluding - wrongly - that the bugreport is a misunderstanding. Thanks for confirming that pcmanfm-qt indeed depends transitively on libgtk2 via libfm-modules. > If you would have a look into salsa/pcmanfm-qt you will notice that i > moved libfm-modules from Recommends to Depends a year ago - i tested > the manager with apt install pcmanfm-qt --no-install-recommends and > pcmanfm-qt refused to start :) - so the modules are a real dependency. I did not do a deep inspection of historical changes to this package. Also, I do not imply that this bug is a simple matter of removing a hint in the package. I imagine the issue is one of compiling things differently and/or patching code. > As i wrote: We will not depend on libfm in the next version of > pcmanfm-qt directly anymore. Certainly we still will depend on > menu-cached that will throw in some libfm things - but i guess that > the dependency to libfm-modules will be gone in 0.14.0. That's great. I am puzzled, however, why you close this bugreport now. I would expect it to be appropriate to close the bugreport when the bug is fixed, not when you have shared the good news about prospected future changes. I shall not revert the bug closing again, but leave it to the package maintainer to decide what is sane for their package. > Disclaimer: This was written not with my Debian Maintainer Hat on - > this was written as a member of the LXQt core team and LXQt release > manager. I appreciate your roles. All of them. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
