On Tuesday 07 March, 2006 ? 11:09:48AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:36:37 +0100 > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > > Please also note that the above comment is from a single member of > > > > the kernel team, not the kernel team in general. A single member > > > > who happen to be bitten by a single specific unsolved bug, for > > > > which the yaird maintainer (me) has refused to apply a workaround > > > > provided by him. > > > > > please fix #345067, it has a patch, and there is no sane reason > > > > > > Really, Sven. Please do not contaminate unrelated bugreports with > > > > your personal frustration over yaird! > > > > > > Well, i am frustrated, but seriously, do you consider that yaird is > > > currently well maintained given the above situation ? I don't, > > > > So all in all (ignoring the comments irrelevant to this bugreport) you > > agree with my statement. Thanks for the confirmation. > > And you do agree that you are doing a piss-poor job of maintaining yaird, > thanks for the confirmation, and now, what do you plan to do about it ? > > Anyway, i have, as you asked me in Erkelenz, escalated #345067 to the > technical comitte, which only shows that you are unable to even look at a 3 > line patch. > > Too bad, like said, i liked yaird better than initramfs-tools, too bad you are > sabotaging it. > > Sven Luther > >
Hi all, Yaird works perfectly fine on all our servers. The only time i tried initramfs-tools, my raid5 were messed up. it was a very serious issue for us. maybe it's a coincidence but i don't want to mess with initramfs-tools anymore. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
