severity 903900 minor
tag 903900 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Nuno Oliveira wrote:
> ### Extra:
> /dev/nvidia0 rw,
> /dev/nvidiactl rw,
> /dev/nvidia-modeset rw,
Nvidia. And looks like the proprietary driver.
(I don't use nvidia cards myself, a IRC query makes people
tell me this looks like the proprietary nvidia driver.)
> /etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security r,
^
(Almost) valid. Though I wonder why LO wants this.
But I think you should use the default JRE (10)...
> owner /tmp/.gl* rwm,
> /proc/driver/nvidia/params r,
> /proc/modules r,
> /usr/share/nvidia/nvidia-application-profiles-* r,
Again Nvidia and the properietary driver.
> /sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes r,
No idea what this does, though. Maybe something done by
the nvidia driver, too?
Even if it was a driver which one is supposed to care about
LO is not using those devices/files directly but going over
libGL, so *that* one has to ship profiles allowing it's use.
(or it being put into some standard abstraction.
So part os it shouldn't be fixed here, and this is a good example
why mixing two different stuff (here: nvidia and java.security) in
one report is bad.
Regards,
Rene
