Le lundi 02 juillet 2018 à 13:33:55+0200, Johannes Schauer a écrit :
> Control: tag -1 - patch
> Control: block -1 by 902856
> 
> Hello, all!
> 
> I merged #891247 with this bug, because (as also correctly identified by Uwe),
> the solution to both is the same.
> 
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:50:49 +0100 Pierre-Elliott =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9cue?= 
> <be...@crans.org> wrote:
> > A patch with better indentation regarding the conventions that seem to be in
> > place.
> 
> thanks for your work! I see what you tried to do there, but I'm afraid that
> idea is very fragile because it will break every time that dpkg-buildpackage
> changes something about the respective options. One indicator of the fragility
> of this approach is, that your patch already is missing some dpkg-buildpackage
> options that influence the later call to dpkg-genchanges. Thus, I would like 
> to
> evaluate alternative approaches.
> 
> I contacted the dpkg maintainers in #902856 and hopefully we will be able to
> find a solution that allows to cleanly fix this issue in sbuild.

Indeed, it's a fragile patch, and it's probably a better idea to have a
clean and more durable fix. :)

Cheers!

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to