Hello, On Thu, Jun 28 2018, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> How about a "should" ? I think that most people won't ignore a >> "should" unless they feel they understand why it's there. > > Yeah, that works well as a compromise. I am not sure what is being referred to here, but the actual text committed to Policy uses "should". The 'required' in the title of this bug is perhaps ambiguous between 'should' and 'must'. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
